RESUME
EDUCATION /Qualification:
1950: Stood first in BA (Hons), Economics, Punjab University , Chandigarh ,
1952; Stood first in MA (Economics), Punjab University , Chandigarh ,
1954; Wright's Prize for distinguished performance at St John's College, Cambridge,
1955 and 1957; Wrenbury scholar, University of Cambridge ,
1957; DPhil ( Oxford ), DLitt (Honoris Causa); PhD thesis on India 's export competitiveness
Working Experience/ POSITIONS:
1971-72: Economic advisor, ministry of foreign trade
1972-76: Chief economic advisor, ministry of finance
1976-80: Director, Reserve Bank of India;
Director, Industrial Development Bank of India ;
Alternate governor for India , Board of governors, Asian Development Bank;
Alternate governor for India, Board of governors, IBRD
OTHER ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
Adam Smith Prize, University of Cambridge , 1956
Padma Vibhushan, 1987
Euro money Award, Finance Minister of the Year, 1993;
Asia money Award, Finance Minister of the Year for Asia , 1993 and 1994
PERSONAL DETAIL:
Name: Dr Manmohan Singh
Browsing through the numerous forwarded mails that I receive everyday, I found this resume. Excerpts of the mail are attached above.
Not going into lengths of verifying if every detail mentioned is true or not, overall I can certainly assume that Mr. Manmohan Singh has been one of the most qualified leaders that
Yet it is a pity that our country’s political leaders cannot stand united and extend their full support to this leader in propelling our country to new heights. The vicious lust for power was brought to fore by the recent vote of confidence.
It was a shame that everybody was jostling to gain power in some way or the other while the common man was provided with lip-service. Some played their cards in the name of inflation, some poverty, some saying the nuclear deal was bad for the country while some even said they were betrayed while all the drama unfolded on the 24*7 news channels.
Parties opposed the deal by saying it was not in the national interests.
- I would certainly want to know how are these people/parties are qualified to make this statement when the nuclear research expert Abdul Kalam felt it was good for the country?
- What interests are they actually talking about as none of their claims were vetted by an expert in that field!
Some said they were betrayed and hence are opposing the deal!
- Since when did individual/parties ego become larger than the country?
- If you had problems with internal communications how can a country be held at ransom for that?
- If you opposed the deal on the basis of your ideology then what was the need to be a part of a coalition government in the first place. A coalition government certainly does not mean 5 individuals running in 5 different directions.
Some opposed plainly because they wanted to be in power (Atleast their intention was clear)
- These were the people with absolutely no educational qualification, no expertise/experience and absolutely no credibility even in
- It would be a sad day for
Finally some opposed only because they were not offered required remuneration for their vote!
Why can’t the political parties and their leaders for once grow above individual interest and work in the interests of this country? Aren’t they the elected members who represent various states of this country first than any party/leader or self! Can’t they respect a man of that stature and instead of making baseless comments against him understand his rationale and fight based on intellect rather than irrational mud-slinging.
Do they not realize that even today nearly 25 percent of